Understand student
experience, drive better
outcomes.
Universities typically track academic outcomes. We help them track the experience indicators that drive those outcomes.
Institutional Intelligence Dashboard
Real-time student engagement metrics, risk predictions, and cohort diagnostics.
Average SEI
0.74
Cohort mean - 0 - 1
Total Students
4,285
Enrolled
Participants
3,942
of 4,285 enrolled
Absenteeism Risk
0.12
0 = no risk · 1 = critical
Presenteeism Index
0.28
0 = none · 1 = high
Cohort Response Integrity
AVG SEI — FEMALE / MALE / OTHER
Female
1,842 resp
Male
2,056 resp
Other
44 resp
SEI MIN · AVG · MAX
Min
0.31
Avg
0.74
Max
0.98
AVG OF 7 DOMAINS
SCORE DISTRIBUTION
Note: This is a limited interactive preview showcasing a fraction of the UI. The actual SEI platform contains significantly more modules, depth, and administrative tools.
Here's what's happening
0% visibility on the 'why'
Grades and attendance tracked. Student experience never.
High dropout rates
College dropout rates range between 25-32.9% for undergraduate students.
Unread feedback
60% of students feel their feedback on the college experience is ignored or unheard.
Every Student Dropout Has an Institutional Business Cost
Student dropout is not just an academic failure; it impacts every facet of your institution's financial model and brand.
Tuition Revenue Loss
Direct loss of annual fee revenue and institutional cash flow.
Reputation Damage
Drop in retention ranking directly affects national prestige.
Lower Graduation Rates
Reduces accreditation standing and eligibility for funding.
Student Dropout
Compounding LossesPlacement Challenges
Dilutes recruiting partnerships due to smaller graduating cohorts.
Reduced Future Admissions
Breaks organic student referral pipelines and legacy recruitment.
Lower Student Satisfaction
Diminishes overall peer morale and prompts negative public sentiment.
Introducing The Student Experience Index
The SEI is a monthly, five-minute, non-clinical reflection across seven domains that make student experience measurable.
Results that speak for themselves
0.356 → 0.128
(lower is better)
10% Reduction
in manual summaries and internal meetings
55% Reduced reliance
via continuous internal measurement
0.64 → 0.86
-60 max scale 140 (+34.4%)
0.361 → 0.131
(lower is better)
Small Retention Gains Create Significant Financial Impact
The financial impact scales directly with enrollment size, tuition fees, and cohort retention.
* Calculations assume an average of 3 years of preserved tuition revenue per retained student.
Revenue Protection Scales Linearly
Every recovered seat preserves tuition flow without artificial ceilings.